in times of economic contraction
U.S. strategic interests in the forthcoming assessment report, proposed to abandon the long-term follow simultaneously fight two wars of strategic principles, and instead simply have asked the U.S. military in a large-scale conventional war fighting capability, while in another conflict may play a sudden This is called
President of the engagement strategies Amendment
[Reuters, Washington, January 3 -] Government officials said that a guidance is expected in the coming years, the Pentagon cut military spending in the U.S. strategic interests assessment report will recommend the U.S. to reduce troops in Europe, and both participate in and give up to win two wars while maintaining military targets.
The Pentagon said today that Defense Secretary Panetta will be 5 main 席马丁登普西 with the Joint Chiefs of Staff will be jointly held a press conference to announce the time to spend eight months a strategic assessment of the results obtained.
A government official said he expects that the evaluation report will recommend the withdrawal of U.S. troops from Europe and then an Army combat brigade, to retain only two brigades in the continental troops. According to the different composition, including a brigade of about 3,000 to 4,000 soldiers.
The officials said the assessment also recommended that the Pentagon to abandon a long-term follow to participate in and win two wars at the same time the strategic principles.
This name unnamed official said the United States will participate and win in a major war at the same time able to cope and
The evaluation initiated by the former Secretary of Defense Robert Gates. President Obama had asked Defense Department officials would not threaten U.S. strategic interests in the case of hundreds of billions of dollars in spending cuts.
White House spokesman Jay Carney said, Obama
U.S. strategic interests in the forthcoming assessment report, proposed to abandon the long-term follow simultaneously fight two wars of strategic principles, and instead simply have asked the U.S. military in a large-scale conventional war fighting capability, while in another conflict may play a sudden This is called
Cut military spending limited military
[British
10 years, successive governments as wayward children like to have a large military expenses in the military, ships, aircraft and UAVs.
However, in times of economic contraction, the Pentagon is having to face the generation time in the implementation of the largest military force reductions, the result will make the U.S. military can not simultaneously two ground wars.
Defense 利昂帕内塔 this week will be expected to show that the U.S. should maintain a large enough scale, to participate and win a major war. However, if you need other parts of the United States to participate in the second world war, they just limited their role to play,
Authorities decided in August last year in the next 10 years to cut defense spending from $ 450 billion, the last year announced a military spending for this assessment.
According to
Politicians generally agree that the military should share the burden of deficit reduction, but everyone addition to funding cuts mixed views.
Panetta warned that reducing the amount of approximately $ 1 trillion in military spending would harm national security, but not everyone agrees with him.
Little sense of strategic change
[United States,
Panetta is expected to be U.S. Secretary of Defense announced a major strategic 5th assessment report of the results, the conclusions will be required in the U.S. only with a large-scale conventional war fighting capability, while another may burst conflict played
Under the new military term, which is called
Expected that this message will cause a stir. But exactly how important this change? How will it affect the U.S. position in the world? Some analysts believe that the They said, in fact, its called
Strategic and Budgetary Assessments defense expert Todd Harrison said: publicly that they do not intend to simultaneously involved in two major wars.
So the war in Iraq and Afghanistan war? Harrison said, they could not really count, because the Pentagon never actually fully engaged in these two wars simultaneously. Culminating in the Iraq war in 2008, then began to decline. Number of U.S. troops in Afghanistan reached its peak in 2011.
Nevertheless, others believe that the war on the outside that this attitude is not a good idea. After all, it may induce an ambitious world powers involved in another battle in the United States when the opportunity to launch a military offensive.
It depends on the United States to play in another war, Harrison said that this strategy actually means: enough time to build military and then the second war.
相关的主题文章：